Leg extension pre-exhaust setBelt SquatsDB Split SquatsOne-legged lying hamstring curlStiff legged deads on belt squatSquatsDonkey calf raise on belt squatNo...
I mean, Evola’s interpretation of the Hindu cast system is also all wrong.
I dig the idea of riding the tiger and being a warrior that isn’t emotionally invested in the trivial political matters of the current Iron Age (Kali Yuga). His idea that a white man can always fuck women of different races because it’s an upgrade if they get pregnant is fun and a bit of a meme.
When does he say it? He must have changed views then, since he constantly goes into spiritual race being more important than physical race which he saw as often times not coinciding.
Ok, I think I’m yet to read those. In his “orientations” ( I think dating from early 50s) which I just picked to re read a couple of days ago he goes into the race being a somewhat basis or ground for the development of certain characteristics but which did not mean they would develop and how individuals of a certain race could develop themselves the best characteristics mostly associated with a different physical body.
In metaphysics of sex he also distinguishes between physical gender and spiritual gender. He concedes there might be misalignments.
There’s several quotes I believe about spiritual rather than physical racism.
“That’s not what I meant by ride the tiger.”
I mean, Evola’s interpretation of the Hindu cast system is also all wrong. I dig the idea of riding the tiger and being a warrior that isn’t emotionally invested in the trivial political matters of the current Iron Age (Kali Yuga). His idea that a white man can always fuck women of different races because it’s an upgrade if they get pregnant is fun and a bit of a meme.
What’s the correct interpretation then?
When does he say it? He must have changed views then, since he constantly goes into spiritual race being more important than physical race which he saw as often times not coinciding.
It’s either Synthesis of the Doctrine of Race or The Elements of Racial Education, one of those 2. Whacky early 1940ies stuff.
Ok, I think I’m yet to read those. In his “orientations” ( I think dating from early 50s) which I just picked to re read a couple of days ago he goes into the race being a somewhat basis or ground for the development of certain characteristics but which did not mean they would develop and how individuals of a certain race could develop themselves the best characteristics mostly associated with a different physical body. In metaphysics of sex he also distinguishes between physical gender and spiritual gender. He concedes there might be misalignments. There’s several quotes I believe about spiritual rather than physical racism.